Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1100 +1568%
22.22 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jul 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
7168
Shading Units
512
448
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
48
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
204 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
694.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
22.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.22 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
22.22 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
100 billion
Transistors
3 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy