Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (2050MHz vs 1733MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 288.5GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 180W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +89%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro P5000
8.873 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Oct 2016
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
1607 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.5GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
4096
Shading Units
2560
256
TMUs
160
128
ROPs
64
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
277.3 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
138.6 GFLOPS
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.873 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
277.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
180W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GP104
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GP104-875-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
16 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net