Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +680%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Aug 2015
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
1024
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GM204
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy