Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+3141%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro 5000M
0.518 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2010
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
4096
Shading Units
320
256
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.100 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.20 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
518.4 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GF100
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM5-A3
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
