Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +633%
16.79 TFLOPS
GRID K520Q
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Data Center GPU
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
1536
256
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GK104
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy