Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA GRID K2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 4GB VRAM GRID K2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+633%
16.79 TFLOPS
GRID K2
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
May 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1536
256
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GK104
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GK104-895-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.175
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
