Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 153% (1950MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+12%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GK110B
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
