NVIDIA CMP 70HX vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 70HX and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 70HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3800 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 70HX
+33368%
10.71 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Jan 2009
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1188 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
608.3GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
30
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
40
120
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
120
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
167.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
10.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
167.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
RV620
GA104-100-A1
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
