NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 50HX
+2127%
11.07 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2021
Release Date
Nov 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1350 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
10GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
560.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
320
192
TMUs
16
80
ROPs
16
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
5 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
123.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
22.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
346.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
105W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
RV670
TU102-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
