NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs Intel Arc A310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (10GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1750MHz vs 1545MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 50HX
+311%
11.07 TFLOPS
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
Blender
CMP 50HX
+165%
1384
Arc A310
521
Graphics Card
Jun 2021
Release Date
Oct 2022
Mining GPUs
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1350 MHz
Base Clock
1750 MHz
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
10GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
560.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
192
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
16
448
Tensor Cores
96
56
RT Cores
6
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
5 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
123.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
22.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
11.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
346.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
DG2-128
TU102-100-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
