Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 185W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
7.603 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +7%
8.192 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Aug 2015
Mining GPUs
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
4096
144
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

185W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Fiji
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.3
© 2025 - TopCPU.net