NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (185W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
7.603 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
+5%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Mar 2016
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
4096
144
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
185W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
Capsaicin
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.0
