NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs Intel Arc A780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (185W vs 200W)
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (2200MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
7.603 TFLOPS
Arc A780
+137%
18.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
2200 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
4096
144
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
288
Tensor Cores
512
36
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS
Board Design
185W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
DG2-512
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
