NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 130W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (2175MHz vs 1785MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX
5.027 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+431%
26.73 TFLOPS
Blender
CMP 30HX
801
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+491%
4737
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Aug 2023
Mining GPUs
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
160bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
48
1408
Shading Units
6144
88
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
130W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
AD104
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
