Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Dec 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
-
88
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

125W
TDP
Unknown
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
RV530
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
Turing
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net