NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs NVIDIA NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
1360 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 125W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX
+4927%
5.027 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Mining GPUs
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
1
1408
Shading Units
48
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GF119
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
