NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1785MHz
Lower TDP (125W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX
5.027 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+388%
24.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
8192
88
TMUs
512
48
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
450W
300 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
22 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
