NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 Duo to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 151W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX
+318%
5.027 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700 Duo
1.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
800
88
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
125W
TDP
151W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
RV770
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
(215-0669049)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
