NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+516%
12.63 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Jul 2022
Mining GPUs
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
1024
280
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
64
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
826 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5
