NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)
Score
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Jan 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
128MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
-
280
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
RV380
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
130 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
9.0
N/A
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
-
