NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs ATI FireGL V8650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+2770%
12.63 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Aug 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR4
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
320
280
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
16
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
R600
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
