NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA NVS 510
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
4288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+4027%
12.63 TFLOPS
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Oct 2012
Mining GPUs
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
192
280
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
16
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GK107
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
8.0
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
