Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
5184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
+292%
13.82 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Nov 2012
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
5GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
320bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
2496
240
TMUs
208
120
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
