Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 8GB VRAM Quadro M4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
6016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +437%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro M4000
2.573 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jun 2015
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
1664
240
TMUs
104
120
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.47 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
80.39 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.573 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
80.39 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
GM204-850-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
120W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy