Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 4GB VRAM Quadro M1200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1148MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +840%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro M1200 Mobile
1.469 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jan 2017
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
991 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1148 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
640
240
TMUs
40
120
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.37 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.92 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1469 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.92 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
45W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy