Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA A10G

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA A10G

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 600.2GB/s)
NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Boost Clock1710MHz
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
A10G +128%
31.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Apr 2021
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1320 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
12GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
9216
240
TMUs
288
120
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy