Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
7424 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +2743%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Nov 2010
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
256
240
TMUs
32
120
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
142W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy