Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
+246%
13.82 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Aug 2022
Xe Graphics
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
96bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
1024
240
TMUs
64
120
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
