Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A60 vs NVIDIA H200 NVL

Intel Arc Pro A60 vs NVIDIA H200 NVL

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 and 141GB VRAM H200 NVL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (2050MHz vs 1785MHz)
Lower TDP (130W vs 600W)
NVIDIA H200 NVL 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (141GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 384.0GB/s)
14848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60
8.397 TFLOPS
H200 NVL +618%
60.32 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
Nov 2024
Alchemist
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1365 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
141GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3e
192bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
132
2048
Shading Units
16896
128
TMUs
528
64
ROPs
24
256
Tensor Cores
528
16
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

131.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.84 GPixel/s
262.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
942.5 GTexel/s
16.79 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
241.3 TFLOPS
8.397 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
60.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.16 TFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
600W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
4x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-256
GPU Name
GH100
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
11.5 billion
Transistors
80 billion
269 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net