Intel Arc Pro A60 vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60
+1589%
8.397 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2023
Release Date
Nov 2007
Alchemist
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
320
128
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
131.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
262.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
16.79 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.397 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
105W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-256
GPU Name
RV670
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.5 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
269 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
