Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (2350MHz vs 2130MHz)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50
4.813 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+149%
12 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Arc Pro A50
3328
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+144%
8147
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Feb 2024
Alchemist
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
22
1024
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
8
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
AD107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
