Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD FirePro W8000

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +49%
4.813 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
1024
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Tahiti
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy