Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jan 2008
Alchemist
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
RV380
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
130 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy