Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile vs AMD FirePro A320

Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile vs AMD FirePro A320

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 83% (1750MHz vs 955MHz)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile +144%
1.792 TFLOPS
FirePro A320
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
955 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
512
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.640 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.92 GTexel/s
3.584 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.792 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
733.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Meteor Lake GT1
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A320
Xe-LPG
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy