Intel Arc A770M vs NVIDIA NVS 5200M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770M and 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A770M
+5533%
13.52 TFLOPS
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Alchemist
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
96
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
211.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.500 GPixel/s
422.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
27.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
20.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GF117
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
N13M-NS1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
