Intel Arc A770M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (1650MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A770M
+450%
13.52 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A770M
+238%
10649
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
3150
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Arc A770M
+255%
5078
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
1429
Blender
Arc A770M
+195%
1714
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
581
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2020
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
4096
Shading Units
1024
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
211.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
422.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
27.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
TU117
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
