Intel Arc A770 vs AMD Radeon R7 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A770
+2641%
19.66 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A770
+2317%
13560
Radeon R7 250
561
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Oct 2013
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2100 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
Cape Verde
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
