Intel Arc A770 vs Intel H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (2400MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A770
+725%
19.66 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Nov 2020
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2100 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
24
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
DG1
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
6 nm
Process Size
10 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
406 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
