Intel Arc A770 vs AMD FirePro S9050
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A770
+509%
19.66 TFLOPS
FirePro S9050
3.226 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Aug 2014
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2100 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1792
256
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
32
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
Tahiti
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
