Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 315 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A770
+43588%
19.66 TFLOPS
GeForce 315 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Feb 2011
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2100 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
33W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GT218
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GT218-300-B1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
