Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A730M vs AMD FirePro W4190M

Intel Arc A730M vs AMD FirePro W4190M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Arc A730M and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A730M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1100MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A730M +878%
6.758 TFLOPS
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2015
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
3072
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.758 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Opal
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy