Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A730M vs AMD FirePro M3900

Intel Arc A730M vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Arc A730M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A730M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1100MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2912 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A730M +2715%
6.758 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Oct 2010
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
3072
Shading Units
160
192
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.758 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Seymour
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
20W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy