Intel Arc A370M vs AMD FirePro M6000
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 43W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A370M
+209%
3.174 TFLOPS
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2012
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
43W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Heathrow
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
