Intel Arc A350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 465 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 102.7GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A350
+259%
3.072 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 465
0.855 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2010
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.7GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
11
768
Shading Units
352
48
TMUs
44
24
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.38 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.75 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
855.4 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
106.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GF100
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GF100-030-A3
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
