Intel Arc A350 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 32W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A350
+9500%
3.072 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2009
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
40
48
TMUs
4
24
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
25W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
RV620
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
