Intel Arc 140T Mobile vs NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM Jetson Nano GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 155% (2350MHz vs 921MHz)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc 140T Mobile
+1939%
4.813 TFLOPS
Jetson Nano GPU
0.236 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2025
Release Date
May 2019
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
Tegra
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
640 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
921 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
128
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.74 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.74 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
471.6 GFLOPS
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
235.8 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Arrow Lake
GPU Name
GM20B
-
GPU Variant
TM660M-A2
Xe2-LPG
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
3 nm
Process Size
20 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
5.3
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
