Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 87% (2100MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
19072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X +18833%
163.4 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Mar 2015
Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
304
Compute Units
-
19456
Shading Units
384
880
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
146 billion
Transistors
Unknown
1017 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

750W
TDP
30W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy