Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
19424 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X +204150%
163.4 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jun 2007
Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
304
Compute Units
-
19456
Shading Units
32
880
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
146 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

750W
TDP
50W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy