AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
14584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 760W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A
+557172%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370M
0.022 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Aug 2008
Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
228
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
14592
Shading Units
8
880
TMUs
4
0
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
760W
TDP
20W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
MI300
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GLM
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
146 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
