Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
14576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 760W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A +471438%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
May 2007
Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM3
Memory Type
DDR2
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
228
Compute Units
-
14592
Shading Units
16
880
TMUs
8
0
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
146 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

760W
TDP
17W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy